New York, NY
June 4, 6:00
Discussion & Signing
with Deanna Raybourn
The Mysterious Bookshop
58 Warren Street
I prefer to receive emails in Text format
Note: Your email will be subscribed to Lauren's newsletter only and will never be shared with a third party.
Lauren’s Book List
Lauren in the News
» July 2011, At RWA, after winning the RITA!
» July 2011, Chatting rather incoherently with Barbara Vey post-RITA
» February 2010, in defense of romance fiction in the Yale Herald.
» January 2010, the New Haven Register reports on romance (scholarship) at Yale.
» January 2010, in the Pink with the Word Wenches.
» February 2009, Lauren answers Maya Rodale’s infamous Six Questions.
» March 2009, the New York Post films Lauren reading as part of an article on Love’s New Thrust.
» February 2009, chatting with host Molly Pesce on B&N’s Tagged.
» February 2009, the Not-So-Secret-Interview on Risky Regencies.
» February 2008, Tasha Alexander interviews Lauren for Bookpage.
2006, Lauren gets her own spot on the B&N
Meet the Writers page—right next to Laura Ingalls Wilder!
2005, the Associated Press picks up on A
Sultry Dose of Romance—From Harvard
» March 2005,
the Harvard Crimson reports: Grad
Student Grabs Readers With Bodice-Ripper
with the Library Journal
Back to the OriginalOctober 15th, 2010
A lovely review of Pink I from the Paperback Princesses. (Don’t you love that name?) The Paperback Princesses dub The Secret History of the Pink Carnation “witty, exciting, romantic, adventurous and downright funny.”
This entry was posted
on Friday, October 15th, 2010 at 8:02 am
and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
One Response to “Back to the Original”
Congrads on yet another great review!!
I was surprised though that they thought the books appropriate for teenagers. The Pink series definitely ranks in the most graphic series I have ever read. I don’t know I think if I gave these books to some of the teens or young adults I know their moms would be angry. Maybe older college age teens. Rated R Maybe PG13. To be fair Pinks #4 and #5 are probably more PG13.
(Of course my parents don’t care, but I am over 20 and they don’t pay attention to what I read.)
I of course am a huge fan of the books but I think a lot of my friends would think they’re too graphic.I honestly think you have to be careful marketing the series to teens.
Leave a Reply
Mail (will not be published) (required)
Home • News • Books • Bio • Diversions • FAQs • Contact • Site/copyright