While I’m having fun with covers…

… here’s a real Pink Carnation artifact: the Lost Cover of Pink I.

Doesn’t that have a nice ring to it? Having a lost anything imparts such a lovely air of antiquity and myth-making, like the lost city of Atlantis or the lost subway stations hidden among the tunnels beneath the city of New York.

And I’m not even making it up. Pink I really does have its own lost pictoral history, a cover that flourished for two brief months before being consigned to the scrap heap. Et voila:

Different, isn’t it? It tells its own little historical story. When the advance copies were being printed up, way back in 2003, chick lit was all the rage and every book cover boasted a trendy bag. By the time the advance copies had shipped, the fickle favor of style had shifted and chick lit, like an aging royal mistress, was no longer chic. To be honest, although I do like the bag of the girl on the original cover (and the lovely leather book), I was delighted when my publisher made a snap decision to switch to this cover:

What do you think?

10 Responses to “While I’m having fun with covers…”

  1. Actually, I rather like the original, but (granted this could be some serious bias to the cover that made the cut LOL) the second makes more sense since most of the chapters are the historical part. If it was more in the 21st century, then yep, it would make sense. But I do agree, it’s mighty nice. :)

    Lois

    by Lois on May 20th, 2008 at 11:54 am

  2. I’m with Lois. I really dig the original cover, but the one that actually made it is more appropriate, imho!

    by Jessica on May 20th, 2008 at 1:58 pm

  3. I’m with both of you on this one. As a composition, I love the original chick lit cover. There’s something very harmonious and aesthetically pleasing about it. But it gave me nervous first time author nightmares about angry readers berating me for selling them historical fiction under cover of chick lit.

    by Lauren on May 20th, 2008 at 2:47 pm

  4. The covers are so extremely different, yet I like the original here almost as much as the published one (which is perfect for the book and therefore I’m glad it’s the one that stuck). I love that the books themselves have two completely different genres that work together so fluidly, and I guess that’s why I’d be happy with either type of cover. Both are very charming, just like their contents :)

    by Angie on May 20th, 2008 at 4:43 pm

  5. Eh, I’m not so sure I don’t like the original better.

    But I wish Eloise wasn’t wearing pink. Red hair and all that.

    by Camille la Flamme on May 22nd, 2008 at 12:15 am

  6. I love the current (non-original) cover! It’s what got me interested. Molds history with a dash of modern. Whoever created them– many kudos!

    Unfortunately, I’m one of “those” who must have a complete matching cover set for favorite series… and dang, my Black Tulip was definitely the hardcover cover, and I needed to get the paperback to match the others. (I totally prefer the paperback covers!)

    Chelsea :)

    by Chelsea :) on May 22nd, 2008 at 9:25 pm

  7. What about both? She could have had a book in her hand and the book’s cover could have been the old. Not too much detail there, but still.

    by Vara on May 23rd, 2008 at 9:50 am

  8. BTW — I am really excited that, on the old cover, they gave the girl red hair, since you make it obvious that our Eloise is a redhead! As a redhead myself, I’m pretty excited to see the color maintained; it’s not always the case! (cough, The Da Vinci code, cough)

    by Jessica on May 23rd, 2008 at 1:06 pm

  9. I love the cover you ultimately used. The original was a bit too … well, chick-litish for me. :) Not that I don’t adore chick lit, but I think the current ocver does your series more justice. A little chick lit, a little mystery, a little regency.

    And hey — When does Eloise figure out that Colin is a spy?

    Thanks for all the fun reads.

    by Kathleen on June 6th, 2008 at 2:59 pm

  10. WOW that’s different! I have to say, I’m one of “those” people who really DOES judge a book by it’s cover. :) I only read historical fiction (well, usually), and I can tell just by looking at the spine or cover of a book if it’s in the time period I like. I rarely pick up a book if it doesn’t fit that mold.

    Yes, I know, I’m probably missing out on dozens of fabulous books by using this method… but would a Nancy Drew book really be the same without the fashionable heroine looking perplexed on the cover? I think not! LOL

    by Tammy on January 27th, 2009 at 3:24 pm

Leave a Reply

 

Brooklyn, NY
Panel & Signing
July 22, 7:30
WORD Bookstore
126 Franklin Street

Orlando, FL
Signing
July 28, 5:30-7:30
The Walt Disney World Swan & Dolphin Resort

Ann Arbor, MI
Reading & Signing
November 9, 7:00
Nicola’s Books
Westgate Shopping Center
2513 Jackson Ave

Houston, TX
Reading & Signing
November 12th, 6:30
Murder by the Book
2342 Bissonnet Street

Dallas, TX
Reading & Signing
November 13, 2:00
Lincoln Park B&N
7700 West Northwest Highway

Plano, TX
Readers 'n Ritas Conference
November 12-14
Radisson Hotel Dallas North-Richardson
1981 North Central Expressway

Wheaton, IL
November 15, 7:00
Borders
101 Rice Lake Square

Chicago, IL
Reading & Signing
November 16, 6:00
60 West Walton Street
Newberry Library Bookstore

Join Lauren's newsletter:

* Email

* Confirm Email

I prefer to receive emails in Text format

Lauren on the Web

Lauren on MySpace

Lauren Blogs at AccessRomance

Lauren Blogs at History Hoydens

Lauren in the News

»February 2010, in defense of romance fiction in the Yale Herald.     

»January 2010, the New Haven Register reports on romance (scholarship) at Yale.     

»January 2010, in the Pink with the Word Wenches.   

»February 2009, Lauren answers Maya Rodale’s infamous Six Questions.

»March 2009, the New York Post films Lauren reading as part of an article on Love’s New Thrust

»February 2009, chatting with host Molly Pesce on B&N’s Tagged

»February 2009, the Not-So-Secret-Interview on Risky Regencies.

»February 2008, Tasha Alexander interviews Lauren for Bookpage.

»January 2006, Lauren gets her own spot on the B&N Meet the Writers page—right next to Laura Ingalls Wilder!

»March 2005, the Associated Press picks up on A Sultry Dose of Romance—From Harvard

»March 2005, the Harvard Crimson reports: Grad Student Grabs Readers With Bodice-Ripper

»November 2004, Q&A with the Library Journal

Lauren's Books


The Betrayal of the Blood Lily
Dutton
January 2010


The Temptation of the Night Jasmine
Dutton
January 2009


The Seduction of the Crimson Rose
Dutton
February 2008


The Deception of the Emerald Ring
Dutton
November 2006


The Masque of the Black Tulip
NAL Trade
October 2006


The Secret History of the Pink Carnation
NAL Trade
January 2006

May 2008
S M T W T F S
« Mar   Jun »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031





Entries (RSS)
Comments (RSS)

 



home - news - books - bio - diversions - faqs - email - site/copyright